Communal Spirit: Cooperative vs. Collective

On Monday I blogged about how 2012 is the official Year of Cooperatives, but then I ran across the amazing Fixers Collective*, which reminded me of the importance of collectives in society as well.

Now I was trying to think how to explain the difference between cooperatives and collectives, but then I found this Wiki entry that expressed it more concisely than I could ever have:

Both Worker cooperatives and collectives are worker-owned, democratic, and self- managed businesses. However, there are some key differences between the two. The following is a basic breakdown of some of the primary differences:

Decision Making

Mainstream companies make major decisions top-down. In self-managed businesses, however, these decisions are worked on, proposed, and decided by the workers.

Cooperatives: Most cooperatives require simple-majority to pass a vote. That is, only over 50% of workers have to approve a motion for it to be passed.

Collectives: Collectives, however, use a consensus model: this means that every worker must vote “yes” in order to make a decision.

Hierarchies

While both cooperatives and collectives reject the hierarchical structure of typical corporations (top-down, in which owners have authority over workers), the two take different approaches to their structures.

Cooperatives: Every worker in a cooperative is also an owner. However, in some larger cooperatives, there exists a form of hierarchy. This might mean that there is a president (elected by the workers), a board of directors (also elected), and so on. However, all major decisions are still made by votes taken in worker assemblies. Yet, most of the time, the smaller the cooperative is the less formal its hierarchy will be – if it has one at all.

Collectives: Collectives tend to strive to abolish any form of hierarchy. This means that no one worker in the collective has any more authority than another worker.

Management

In a conventional company, managers carry out the will and the decisions of the owners. However, in cooperatives and collectives, the workers are the owners. This means that if there are managers, their role is to manage decisions and guidelines set forth by the workers (although it is important to understand that managers are also considered workers).

Cooperatives: Larger cooperatives are more likely to employ managers than collectives because this is often viewed as a form of hierarchy. In many cooperatives with managers, the workers can hire and fire the managers. Most managers, if possible, are also promoted from within the cooperative so that they have familiarity and trust with the workers.

Collectives: Collectives are much less likely to have managers, but when they do, they will often use a system of “rotating” management. This means that one worker serves as the manager for a designated period of time (for example, 3 months) and then another worker takes their place. Some cooperatives also use this practice.

More Differences

There are many different types of cooperatives and collectives, and the two types can often overlap in similarities. Remember – a collective is always a cooperative, but a cooperative is not always a collective. The descriptions above are not the law, and co-ops can vary greatly in what practices they adopt.

*In the case of Fixers Collective, it seems like the term “collective” is being used more to reference a group with a common interest/goal, much like an artists’ collective. As a side note, I did want to make sure I mentioned what Fixers is all about, because it’s a really neat idea:

Fixers’ Collective NYC is a group of folks dedicated to working together to fix things – encouraging improvisational fixing and mending and fighting planned obsolescence. FC began as a part of the Mend exhibit at Proteus Gowanus in Brooklyn, and continues as a Project In Residence at Proteus.

We meet regularly for “fixing sessions” where people bring in something broken and we work together to try to fix it or creatively reuse it as something else. Our group includes “Master Fixers” who have a lot of knowledge and experience in fixing, apprentices who are looking to learn, and drop in visitors who come to fix socially or see what we’re up to.

Our goal is to increase material literacy in our community by fostering an ethic of creative caring toward the objects in our lives.

I love the idea of encouraging respect for material objects. Reminds me of a post I saw on Apartment Therapy titled Buy Well, Buy Onceand of a little ditty I once heard:

Use it up
Wear it out
Make it do
Or do without

What kinds of collectives would make sense in your local area?

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s